← Back to Projects
July 2025 - Present Independent Research Novel Discovery

TWF2 as a Highly Specific Modulator of α-Synuclein in Parkinson's Disease

A Computational Discovery from Large-Scale Perturbation Screening

Using differential expression analysis across 150 CRISPRi perturbations in 221,273 single cells, I identified TWF2 (Twinfilin-2) as a novel therapeutic target that reduces SNCA expression by 88% while affecting only 10 genes - 4.6-fold more specific than median perturbation.

Computational Biology Single-Cell RNA-seq Parkinson's Disease CRISPRi Screening Python

The Discovery

Parkinson's disease affects over 10 million people worldwide, yet no curative therapies exist. Aggregation of α-Synuclein (encoded by SNCA) creates Lewy bodies causing neurodegeneration, making SNCA reduction an attractive therapeutic strategy.

However, most known SNCA modulators are transcription factors that affect thousands of genes, limiting their therapeutic potential due to off-target effects. The ideal target would strongly reduce SNCA while being non-essential and having minimal effects on other genes.

Key Finding

TWF2 knockdown reduces SNCA by 88%

This represents the strongest non-self-targeting SNCA reduction in the dataset, while affecting only 10 genes (0.055% of transcriptome) - an exceptionally specific profile for therapeutic development.

Literature search confirms no prior publications directly linking TWF2 to SNCA expression or Parkinson's disease, establishing this as a novel computational discovery with therapeutic potential.

Key Metrics

221,273 Single Cells Analyzed in dataset
148 Perturbations CRISPRi knockdowns tested
88% SNCA Reduction By TWF2 knockdown
10 Genes Affected 0.055% of transcriptome

Statistical Significance

TWF2's effect on SNCA has p-value < 10⁻³⁰⁰, surviving Bonferroni correction across all 148 perturbations (α = 3.38×10⁻⁴). With 1,008 TWF2 knockdown cells vs 38,176 control cells, statistical power exceeds 99% for all observed effects.

Why TWF2 Stands Out

The critical advantage of TWF2 is exceptional specificity. While other strong SNCA reducers affect hundreds to thousands of genes, TWF2 achieves comparable efficacy with 67- to 447-fold fewer off-target effects:

TWF2 (This Discovery)

SNCA Reduction 88%
Genes Affected 10
% of Genome 0.055%
Specificity vs Median 4.6× better

SOX2 (Transcription Factor)

SNCA Reduction 42%
Genes Affected 1,841
% of Genome 10.2%
Comparison to TWF2 184× worse

TWF2 is 4.6-fold more specific than the median perturbation (46 genes) and 53-fold more specific than the mean (533 genes). This exceptional specificity likely reflects post-transcriptional mechanisms rather than broad transcriptional regulation.

Complete Off-Target Profile

All 10 genes significantly affected by TWF2 knockdown (adjusted p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 0.25, |Cohen's d| > 0.2):

Rank Gene Reduction Log2FC Cohen's d Functional Notes
1 TWF2 90.4% −3.38 −4.45 Actin-binding protein (intended target)
2 SNCA 88.3% −3.09 −1.71 α-Synuclein (therapeutic target)
3 ZNF233 68.7% −1.68 −0.38 Zinc finger protein (non-essential)
4 PPM1M 41.7% −0.78 −0.23 Phosphatase (non-essential)
5 SMIM24 35.4% −0.63 −0.26 Membrane protein (non-essential)
6 DPEP1 30.7% −0.53 −0.21 Dipeptidase (non-essential)
7 ZNF248 30.6% −0.53 −0.26 Zinc finger protein (non-essential)
8 HTR7 27.8% −0.47 −0.34 Serotonin receptor (may benefit PD depression)
9 PINLYP 22.2% −0.36 −0.23 Lipase inhibitor (non-essential)
10 HPN 19.5% −0.31 −0.21 Protease (non-essential)

All 8 off-targets are non-essential according to DepMap analysis. Notably, HTR7 (serotonin 5-HT7 receptor) reduction may provide ancillary benefits, as depression affects ~50% of PD patients and 5-HT7 antagonists show antidepressant-like effects in preclinical models.

Mechanistic Hypothesis

The TWF2-SNCA relationship is biologically plausible through established connections between actin cytoskeleton dynamics and α-synuclein biology:

Proposed Pathway

TWF2 Knockdown Altered Actin Dynamics mRNA Trafficking Disruption SNCA mRNA Reduction

TWF2 (Twinfilin-2) is an actin-binding protein that regulates actin dynamics through barbed-end capping and G-actin sequestration. Three potential mechanisms warrant experimental investigation:

mRNA Localization & Stability

The actin cytoskeleton regulates mRNA trafficking in neurons. Disrupted actin dynamics from TWF2 loss could destabilize SNCA mRNA or prevent proper trafficking to presynaptic terminals.

Direct RNA Binding

Gene Ontology annotations identify TWF2 as an RNA-binding protein. TWF2 could directly bind SNCA mRNA, regulating its stability, localization, or translation.

Synaptic Site Specificity

A 2023 study identified TWF2 as a modulator of dendritic spine morphology. Both TWF2 and SNCA are enriched at synaptic sites, suggesting localized regulatory effects.

Supporting Literature

Overexpression of actin-severing proteins (gelsolin, cofilin) rescues α-synuclein neurotoxicity in Drosophila, mouse, and human tissue, validating actin-regulating proteins as therapeutic targets.

The exceptional specificity of this effect (only 10 genes affected) argues against broad actin disruption, which would impact hundreds of genes. Instead, TWF2 may specifically regulate a small subset of mRNAs through direct RNA binding or localized effects at synaptic sites.

Computational Methods

1

Dataset & Preprocessing

Analyzed CRISPRi perturbation data from the Arc Institute's Virtual Cell Challenge: 221,273 single cells with 148 genetic perturbations across 18,080 genes. Processed using scanpy (v1.9.6) with library-size normalization to 10,000 counts per cell and log-transformation.

2

Differential Expression Analysis

For each perturbation, compared expression in knockdown cells to 38,176 non-targeting controls using Welch's t-test. P-values adjusted using Benjamini-Hochberg FDR (α=0.05). Genes classified as significant if adjusted p < 0.05, |log2FC| > 0.25, and |Cohen's d| > 0.2.

3

Landscape Analysis

Ranked all 148 perturbations by both specificity (total significant genes) and therapeutic potential (SNCA expression change) to identify candidates combining strong SNCA reduction with minimal off-target effects.

4

Statistical Validation

Applied Bonferroni correction across 148 perturbations (α = 3.38×10⁻⁴). Verified chromosomal separation (TWF2: 15q21.2; SNCA: 4q22.1) and confirmed no technical confounding through cell quality metrics analysis (UMI counts p=0.85, genes detected p=0.96).

Ruling Out Artifacts

Multiple lines of evidence argue against technical artifacts:

Bonferroni Correction

All 10 TWF2-affected genes remain highly significant after correction for 148 perturbations

Cell Quality

No differences in UMI counts (p=0.85) or genes detected (p=0.96) between TWF2 and control cells

Chromosomal Separation

TWF2 (15q21.2) and SNCA (4q22.1) on different chromosomes; CRISPRi cannot cause trans-chromosomal effects

Weak Co-regulation

TWF2-SNCA correlation across all perturbations is only r=0.408, indicating specific effect

Statistical Power

>99% power to detect all observed effects with 1,008 TWF2 knockdown cells

No Compensation

TWF2's paralog TWF1 shows no compensatory change (log2FC=0.061, p=0.94)

Therapeutic Potential

TWF2 presents an attractive therapeutic profile:

Non-Essential Target

DepMap analysis indicates TWF2 is non-essential for cell viability in cancer cell lines. TWF2 knockout mice are viable without obvious abnormalities.

Existing Inhibitors

Small-molecule TWF2 inhibitors exist (e.g., salvianolic acid E targeting TWF2-YAP interaction), potentially accelerating drug development.

Exceptional Specificity

Affecting only 10 genes (all non-essential) suggests a favorable therapeutic window compared to broad transcriptional regulators.

Ancillary Benefits

HTR7 reduction may provide antidepressant benefits - relevant since depression affects ~50% of PD patients.

Next Steps for Validation

Recommended validation pathway: (1) Orthogonal validation using siRNA and antisense oligonucleotides to confirm the effect is not CRISPRi-specific; (2) Disease-relevant validation in iPSC-derived dopaminergic neurons measuring both mRNA and protein levels; (3) Mechanistic studies including RNA stability assays, subcellular fractionation, and live-cell imaging to determine the regulatory mechanism.